← Back to EMF Signal Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
Moskowitz commentary 5g

📊 Moskowitz's SaferEMR 5G research review, August 2026 update: 18 of 80 papers now test real 5G, still 'flying blind'

August 30, 2026 (EMFS)
Aug 26, 2026 (original)
Source: Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
Source category: Voice
AI use
Joel M. Moskowitz portrait
🎙️ Voice contributor
Joel M. Moskowitz
Public health researcher, SaferEMR
EMF Signal's coverage does not imply that the author endorses EMF Signal.
Joel Moskowitz has refreshed his SaferEMR 5G research review (updated 26 Aug 2026). Since our Feb 2026 coverage the EMF-Portal 5G count is up from 1,099 to 1,242 papers, the medical/biological subset from 64 to 80, and papers testing real 5G modulation (not continuous waves at 5G-band frequencies) from 12 to 18. Walking through each of the 18, Moskowitz notes several nulls (Haidar, Michelant, Jyoti, Sannino, Torkan) and narrow, exposure-specific effects (Sousouri on sleep EEG), but flags that most were short-duration and small-sample with "low statistical power", so nulls are not evidence of safety, and he still calls population-scale 5G safety "flying blind".
Note: Update to our earlier piece on the same SaferEMR page (Moskowitz: only 12 of 64 '5G studies' actually tested real 5G signals, Feb 2026). SaferEMR keeps this review at one persistent URL that Joel Moskowitz updates in place; we cover each substantive update as its own note.

"of the 1,242 papers published on "5G," only 80 papers or 6 percent, were medical/biological studies"

— Joel M. Moskowitz, UC Berkeley

"only 18 of these 80 papers actually discussed studies that tested the effects of 5G exposure"

— Joel M. Moskowitz, UC Berkeley

"Almost all of the following 80 "5G medical/biological studies" listed in EMF-Portal reported significant adverse biological or health effects; however, of these 80 papers (not studies), 62 papers tested 5G carrier frequencies but did not use 5G modulation."

— Joel M. Moskowitz, UC Berkeley

"Twelve papers (nine studies) examined the effects of 5G exposure using a signal generator that simulated some type of 5G modulation (although not other key features of 5G). Sousouri (2024) appears to have used typical real-world 5G signals. Most studies were of short duration and had small sample sizes resulting in low statistical power and limited ability to detect small- or moderate-sized effects."

— Joel M. Moskowitz, UC Berkeley

"Thus, to quote Senator Richard Blumenthal, we are still "flying blind" with regard to ensuring the safety of the population from the short- and long-term effects of widespread exposure to 5G radiation."

— Joel M. Moskowitz, UC Berkeley

Location

📍 United States of America

Map: US

Source

5G Wireless Technology: Is 5G Harmful to Our Health? saferemr.com

More on this topic