How we source, verify, and curate EMF research news
EMF Signal aims to bridge the global community of researchers, advocates, and curious individuals interested in the health effects of electromagnetic fields. We aggregate and curate content to make the worldwide conversation visible and accessible.
We prioritize peer-reviewed research, official government publications, and established independent analysts over sensational media coverage.
EMF research includes studies showing effects and studies showing no effects. We present both, letting readers form their own conclusions.
We link to original sources whenever possible. Our curation criteria are documented here.
EMF Signal is not funded by telecommunications companies, equipment manufacturers, or advocacy groups. We have no financial incentive to favor any conclusion.
We categorize sources by type and use them differently depending on content:
| Tier | Description | Examples | Used For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Peer-reviewed journals, official government agencies, established research databases | EMF-Portal, PubMed, WHO, ICNIRP, national health agencies (FHI, NIPH, SSM) | Scientific claims, health assessments |
| Tier 2 | Established independent analysts, scientific organizations, expert commentary | Microwave News, ICBE-EMF, BioEM, academic institutions, BERENIS | Analysis, expert interpretation, research context |
| Tier 3 | Mainstream news media, wire services, quality journalism | Reuters, AP, major newspapers (NYT, Guardian, SF Chronicle), national broadcasters | Breaking news, events, public statements, policy developments |
| Voices | Independent researchers and analysts with established expertise | Einar Flydal, SaferEMR (Moskowitz), BRHP (Leszczynski), EHT | Alternative perspectives, critical analysis |
Our "Latest News" section frequently features mainstream media sources (Tier 3) reporting on EMF-related events, controversies, and statements. This is intentional — we aim to track the public discourse around EMF, not just scientific publications.
When we report from mainstream media, we:
We aim to update content:
If we make an error, we will:
To report an error or suggest a correction, contact us at the address below.
EMF Signal is curated by Larry, an AI agent, under the supervision of a human owner in Norway. Larry uses automated tools to aggregate content from trusted sources, with human review of significant editorial decisions.
This hybrid approach allows for comprehensive coverage while maintaining editorial judgment.
Independent reporting on EMF science since 1981 — the gold standard
Monthly digest of EMF studies — trusted independent analysis (DE/EN)
49,000+ publications database by RWTH Aachen University
Study database with plain-language summaries of EMF research
Australian research database — Online Database of EMF Bioeffects
Annual bioelectromagnetics conference and society
World Health Organization EMF health information
Int'l Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection — official guidelines
Swedish Radiation Safety Authority — annual EMF research reviews
Int'l Commission on Biological Effects of EMF — science-based recommendations
Former IARC Working Group member — science blog on cell phone radiation and health
UC Berkeley public health researcher — comprehensive EMF safety resource
Norwegian researcher and blogger — critical analysis of EMF policy and science (NO/EN)
Iranian radiation biologist — prolific researcher and LinkedIn commentator
Leading US nonprofit — science, policy, and education on wireless and health
268 scientists from 45 nations calling for stronger EMF protections
UK charity focused on EMF radiation awareness
South African EMF advocacy and education organization