← Back to EMF Signal Bioelectromagnetics
Research Exposure limits

Flagship EMF Journal: Safety Limits for Low-Frequency EMF Should Use Peak Values

Apr 6, 2026 (EMFS)
Mar 26, 2026 (original)
AI use

A new correspondence in Bioelectromagnetics argues that current low-frequency EMF safety limits are structurally flawed: they are based on root-mean-square (RMS) averages, but nerve and muscle stimulation responds to instantaneous peak values. Pulsed fields from devices like retail security deactivators can comply with today's limits while still triggering biological excitation.

"Current low-frequency EMF exposure limits are based on RMS values. However, the hazard at low frequencies, neural and muscular stimulation is driven by instantaneous peak values."

— Soyka & Alteköster, Bioelectromagnetics 2026

"Pulsed or bursty fields—such as those emitted by certain deactivators used in electronic article surveillance—may comply with RMS-based limits despite containing peaks capable of exceeding physiological thresholds."

— Soyka & Alteköster, Bioelectromagnetics 2026

"Reformulating both basic restrictions and reference levels in terms of peak values would align exposure limits with neurophysiological mechanisms and provide clearer guidance for ensuring safety."

— Soyka & Alteköster, Bioelectromagnetics 2026

Source

Why Low-Frequency EMF Safety Would Benefit From Peak-Based Limits Instead of RMS Values onlinelibrary.wiley.com

📄 Underlying Research

Bioelectromagnetics Journal Level 1

🔗 DOI
𝕏 f in 🦋

More on this topic