Quotes
"The problems are not believed to represent intentional scientific misconduct by the authors, however, who were able to provide a new set of data figures without the noted problems. Nonetheless, given the extent of the concerns identified, which affect all eight data figures in the paper, the Society and Journal have decided to retract the article rather than publish a correction of unprecedented scope at this late stage."
"It's the only paper I know that provides a complete, fully worked-out molecular mechanism, literally down to the individual enzyme that first reacts to the microwaves, to explain a drastic non-thermal effect of cellphone radiation."
"This study had been cited over 450 times in the literature. I corresponded briefly with the lead author in 2017 and he assured me that there hadn’t been a single substantial challenge to anything in the paper. All the other research extended and amplified its findings. I had put this paper to industry CEOs, top officials at WHO and many other agencies, academics, government radiation health officials, plus the whole range of the media, explaining that it blew the entire radiation protection racket straight out of the water. None of them was ever able to provide a response beyond running for cover. So when I saw in 2025 that this paper had been retracted, I was very deeply shocked. I wrote to the lead author several times without reply. I asked around all my networks, including an email list of over 100 top academics and activists in this field. I wrote to Microwave News, the most authoritative source in this murky field. No one knew what was going on. "
"So the accusation is extremely unclear and ambiguous in both suggesting and not suggesting deliberate manipulation of data."
Location
📍 World (International)