← Back to EMF Signal E Flydal / einarflydal.com
Flydal commentary Who Policy

🇳🇴 Flydal: Top-Downloaded WHO Review Was Sidelined in Norwegian Institute of Public Health Assessment

May 14, 2026 (EMFS)
May 13, 2026 (original)
AI use
Einar Flydal argues that the Mevissen et al. systematic review on RF radiation and cancer in animals — downloaded about 28,000 times in 2025, making it Environment International's top paper — was sidelined in the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) 2026 EMF health risk assessment, which reviewed low-level RF-EMF exposure from 100 kHz to 300 GHz.

Quotes (our translation)

"By filtering out this one and choosing the other 11 studies for their assessment, the NIPH reviewers ensured that no health effects could be demonstrated in their material. For that simply follows from the method these others have used."

[original: "Ved å sile bort denne og velge de andre 11 studiene til sin utredning sikret FHI-utrederne at det ikke kunne påvises noen helsevirkninger i deres materiale. For det følger ganske enkelt av metoden disse andre har brukt."]

— Einar Flydal

"The authors of this one article resisted the pressure from ICNIRP members who assisted the small WHO office in creating the research protocol. Instead of following it, they researched the way they believed one must if research is to be good, honest and fit for purpose."

[original: "Forfatterne av denne ene artikkelen sto imot presset fra ICNIRP-medlemmene som bisto det lille WHO-kontoret med å lage forskningsprotokollen. I stedet for å følge den forsket de slik de mente man må om forskningen skal være god og hederlig og egnet for oppgaven."]

— Einar Flydal

Source

Forskningsartikkel som avslører WHOs «strålevern» gikk til topps i 2025 einarflydal.com

📰 News Event

NIPH EMF Health Risk Assessment 2026

2026-01-26

📎 Also covered by

More on this topic