Moskowitz: Only 12 of 64 '5G Studies' Actually Tested Real 5G Signals โ€” EMF Signal
โ† EMF Signal Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
Moskowitz commentary Research 5g

๐Ÿ“Š Moskowitz: Only 12 of 64 '5G Studies' Actually Tested Real 5G Signals

Feb 21, 2026 (EMFS)
Feb 11, 2026 (original)

Joel Moskowitz reviews all 64 '5G medical/biological studies' in EMF-Portal and finds only 12 actually tested real 5G modulation. Most used continuous waves at 5G frequencies, missing the beamforming and MIMO features that create intense exposure bursts.

"Of the 1,099 papers published on '5G,' only 64, less than six percent, were medical/biological studies."

โ€” Joel M. Moskowitz, UC Berkeley

"However, only 12 of these 64 studies actually tested the effects of 5G exposure. The biological and health effects associated with exposure to 5G radiation depend on more than just the carrier frequency."

โ€” Joel M. Moskowitz, UC Berkeley

"5G requires a complex modulated, orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) signal with additional features (i.e., beamforming, massive MIMO, and phased arrays) that yield brief, high intensity exposures."

โ€” Joel M. Moskowitz, UC Berkeley

"Thus, to quote Senator Richard Blumenthal, we are still 'flying blind' with regard to ensuring the safety of the population from the short- and long-term effects of widespread exposure to 5G radiation."

โ€” Joel M. Moskowitz, UC Berkeley

Source

5G Wireless Technology: Is 5G Harmful to Our Health? saferemr.com
๐• f in ๐Ÿฆ‹

More on this topic