← Back to EMF Signal

📓 Cartoons

EMF Signal's editorial cartoons on the EMF debate. AI-assisted artwork; concept and editorial framing by EMF Signal.

Four-panel comic. 2005 Finland: Dariusz Leszczynski proposes at STUK to compare skin samples from EHS-sensitive vs non-sensitive subjects; his boss forbids EHS research. 2018 Australia: Leszczynski tells Rodney Croft that ICNIRP should recommend proteomics and transcriptomics on EHS; Croft says no evidence that research is needed. Years pass; Leszczynski presents biochemical tests for EHS to skeptical peers, dismissed and ostracized. 2026 France: ANSES issues a research call for biochemical markers of EHS; Leszczynski notes it is the first national agency to ask, after 21 years.

21 years for EHS biochemistry to be taken seriously

Aug 30, 2026

Scientist Dariusz Leszczynski spent years advocating for biochemical research on electrohypersensitivity, before finally ... Our coverage

Four-panel comic: a scientist dismisses EHS, a critic says the no-effect studies are weak and EHS is plausible, EHS advocates protest that 'plausible' is too weak, and the critic is left confused between both camps.

Caught in the middle of the EHS debate

Aug 26, 2026

After Danish EHS Association chairman David Wedege announced his resignation, debate erupted on Twitter/X. Our coverage · The Twitter discussion